Riley Moss led the NFL in a bad category, but it’s defensible
Denver's CB2 was one of the most-penalized players in the NFL last season, but the morning show argues the circumstances behind those penalties matter more than the stat itself
Watch: We're going to see a BETTER version of Bo Nix this year! | Dover and Cecil | 26 seconds
There is a stat line attached to Riley Moss heading into the 2026 season that looks terrible in isolation. Ten defensive penalties. It’s the kind of number that gets slapped onto a graphic during a national broadcast and immediately shapes the perception of a player for millions of viewers who haven’t watched him play a single snap.
But on a recent edition of “Stokley and Evans, with Mark Schlereth” on 104.3 The Fan, one of the co-hosts peeled back the layers behind that number, and what he found was a player being punished as much by circumstance as by his own mistakes.
Schlereth started with the baseline evaluation that tends to get lost in the penalty conversation.
“I think Riley played really well. And I think when you get a reputation for being handsy, that reputation follows you around the league,” Schlereth said.
Moss is a physical cornerback. He plays with his hands. He likes to disrupt at the line of scrimmage and challenge receivers through their routes.
When that approach works, it looks like elite press coverage. When it doesn’t, it looks like a penalty. And once the flag count starts climbing, something else takes over, perception.
“The officials are like, ‘Hey, watch this guy; he gets really handsy.’ And then it’s a precursor to just throwing more flags in his direction,” Schlereth explained.
That’s the reality of NFL officiating that rarely gets discussed publicly. Officials carry internal awareness of players who have been flagged frequently. That awareness, consciously or not, creates a lower threshold for future calls.
A borderline play that might go uncalled against an anonymous corner gets flagged against a player with Moss’ reputation. The margin for error shrinks with every penalty that gets added to the record.
Then there is the strategic element, the part of the equation that opposing offenses actively exploit.
“And then receivers take advantage of it. You know, receivers will push off and do things to him, and he’ll be the one that gets called,” Schlereth said.
That’s the cycle that makes the penalty total so misleading. Once the league identifies a corner who draws flags, offensive coordinators and receivers start engineering contact specifically designed to bait additional calls.
A receiver initiates a push-off, Moss responds with his hands, and the flag lands on the defensive player because the reputation has already been established. The receiver knows it. The coordinator knows it. And Moss is left fighting a battle where the officiating deck is stacked against him before the ball is even snapped.
The other critical piece of context is where Moss lines up every Sunday, directly opposite Pat Surtain II. Surtain is one of, if not the best cornerback in football. His presence eliminates one side of the field entirely, which funnels the majority of an opponent’s passing game toward Moss’ side.
More targets mean more contested catches. More contested catches mean more opportunities for contact. And more contact means more chances for a flag to hit the turf.
Moss isn’t blameless. Ten penalties is 10 penalties, and there are moments on tape where the hands come out too early or the grab is too obvious. That’s an area of his game that needs refinement, and he would be the first to acknowledge it.
But the narrative that the penalty total makes him a liability ignores every structural factor working against him, the Surtain effect, the officiating reputation and the calculated exploitation by opposing receivers.
Riley Moss is a good cornerback playing under difficult circumstances. Schlereth sees it. The Broncos coaching staff sees it. And Broncos Country should see it too, even when the penalty column suggests otherwise.






Comments
0 Comments